Key Takeaways
- Andreessen Horowitz is likely one of the most achieved traders within the expertise and cryptocurrency house.
- Regardless of its spectacular observe file, the agency has made some blunders over time.
- A few of its worst bets embrace OpenBazaar, Diem, Foundation, and BitClout.
Share this text
Andreessen Horowitz established itself as a crypto heavyweight by inserting successful bets on business mainstays like Uniswap, Solana, and Sky Mavis early on. The agency additionally launched a record-breaking $4.5 billion crypto fund in Could 2022, highlighting its dedication to blockchain expertise. However even Silicon Valley’s prime gamers make funding blunders on occasion. Listed here are a few of the prime failed crypto tasks Andreessen Horowitz has made dangerous bets on over the previous few years.
Andreessen Horowitz and OpenBazaar
OpenBazaar was an early crypto undertaking with hyperlinks to Bitcoin’s darkish market period. The undertaking tried to create a decentralized peer-to-peer market for items and companies, akin to an open-source model of eBay with cryptocurrency funds.
OpenBazaar was coded by Bitcoin developer Amir Taaki and a bunch of programmers from the startup Airbitz as a part of a Toronto Bitcoin hackathon in April 2014. Nonetheless, the undertaking’s creators later deserted it, and the code was adopted and rebranded to OpenBazaar by a brand new staff of builders. The primary model launched on April 4, 2016.
As OpenBazaar, the undertaking attracted curiosity from a number of of crypto’s prime enterprise capital companies. Andreessen Horowitz, Union Sq. Ventures, and Digital Forex Group all backed OpenBazaar via its seed funding rounds. Andreessen Horowitz contributed to OpenBazaar’s $1 million and $3 million seed rounds in addition to a later $5 million Sequence A elevate. In response to data from Crunchbase, OB1, the corporate growing OpenBazaar, obtained greater than $9 million in enterprise capital funding all through its life.
Nonetheless, regardless of its early success and ample funding, OpenBazaar was unable to carve out a spot for itself within the quickly increasing crypto business. On January 4, 2021, OB1 announced that it will stop supporting the OpenBazaar market’s wallets, APIs, search engine and web site, successfully ending the undertaking.
Former OB1 CEO and OpenBazaar undertaking lead Brian Hoffman shed some mild on the undertaking’s downfall in a July 2021 CoinDesk interview. He mentioned that conflicting narratives of Bitcoin being each an funding and a funds system was the largest headwind for OpenBazaar. “Crypto, notably Bitcoin, developed from an inexpensive money different right into a retailer of worth—a digital gold—that didn’t make it conducive to each day Amazon-type e-commerce purchases,” he mentioned.
In hindsight, Hoffman additionally theorized that if OpenBazaar had prioritized stablecoin assist early and monetized the platform by charging a small price on all transactions, it might have had a greater probability of success. Though OpenBazaar had a powerful basis and an all-star roster of backers, its failure will function a reminder of the dangerous nature of enterprise investing.
Diem’s Downfall
Diem was Fb’s reply to rising curiosity in cryptocurrency funds, and it obtained large assist from Andreessen Horowitz and different heavyweights early on. Fb introduced Diem underneath the identify Libra in June 2019, touting it as a technique to ship cash throughout its suite of social media platforms with out counting on third-party intermediaries or advanced forex conversions.
Deliberate as a stablecoin pegged to the greenback, the undertaking was set to run on a permissioned blockchain-based system created by the corporate’s builders. It rebranded from Libra to Diem in December 2020, previous Fb’s October 2021 Meta revamp because it introduced a pivot towards the Metaverse.
Though Diem fell underneath the corporate’s centralized improvement, it delegated administration to a 3rd occasion often known as the Diem Affiliation, of which Meta was one among many members with equal voting weight. This cohort of corporations acted as stewards for the Diem forex whereas additionally overseeing its improvement.
Andreessen Horowitz was an early investor within the Diem undertaking and a member of the Diem Affiliation alongside enterprise companies like Breakthrough Initiatives, Union Sq. Ventures, and Temasek Holdings. It’s unclear how a lot capital Diem raised, or the quantity that Andreessen Horowitz contributed. In response to a July 1 article from CNET, many of the Diem Affiliation members had been anticipated to contribute as a lot as $10 million every to the undertaking’s improvement.
Like lots of Andreessen Horowitz’s investments, Diem began out with ample assist from business heavyweights. Early backers equivalent to eBay, Mastercard, PayPal, Stripe and Visa hinted that Diem was nicely positioned to bridge the hole between conventional finance and crypto. Nonetheless, because the undertaking grew, it drew growing scrutiny from U.S. lawmakers.
In 2019, a number of conflicts with regulators and politicians weighed on Diem’s long-term viability. A July Senate Banking Committee listening to resulted in policymakers evaluating Diem and its creators to arsonists and film villains, with one of many extra vocal critics, Senator Kennedy(R-LA), expressing his skepticism in regards to the undertaking by saying, “Fb desires to manage the financial provide. What might presumably go improper?”
A number of distinguished Democrats from the U.S. Home Committee on Monetary Providers weighed in, sending a letter asking Meta to stop Diem improvement, citing privateness, nationwide safety, buying and selling, and financial coverage issues. Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell also remarked that the Fed had “critical issues” over how Diem would take care of points equivalent to cash laundering and client safety.
The President’s Working Group on Monetary Markets doubled down on these issues, stating that combining a stablecoin issuer with an enormous company “might result in an extreme focus of financial energy.” Even former President Donald Trump joined in airing his skepticism towards the undertaking. “If Fb and different corporations wish to turn into a financial institution, they have to search a brand new Banking Constitution and turn into topic to all Banking Rules,” he mentioned in a tweet.
After resounding pushback in opposition to Diem within the U.S., eBay, Mastercard, Mercado Pago, PayPal, Stripe, Visa Inc., and different key backers withdrew their assist. After two extra years of sluggish improvement and continued regulatory strain, the Diem Affiliation made a deal to promote the expertise behind the undertaking to Silvergate Capital Corp for $200 million in January 2022. The sale marked the top of the Diem undertaking in its present kind.
Backing Nader Al-Naji’s Foundation and BitClout
The ultimate Andreessen Horowitz funding blunder on our record comes within the type of a double characteristic: Foundation and BitClout.
First up is Foundation, a decentralized, algorithmic stablecoin undertaking co-founded and led by one among crypto’s most notorious entrepreneurs—Nader Al-Naji. The undertaking aimed to maintain its Foundation stablecoin pegged to the greenback via on-chain auctions, which issued “bond” and “share” tokens to regulate the Foundation provide. Foundation was formidable in its mission, saying it wished to create a “higher financial system” that might be proof against hyperinflation, free from centralized management, and extra sturdy than the present strategies for transferring wealth. The undertaking was an early try at making a steady, unbacked, dollar-pegged token, serving as inspiration for different failed stablecoin tasks like Foundation Money and Terra.
Questions of viability apart, Foundation made positive it appeared the half with cool fintech branding and a staff of former Google and Goldman Sachs workers. Below Al-Naji’s steerage, Foundation raised $133 million in April 2018, attracting large names like Bain Capital Ventures, one-time Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh, Lightspeed Enterprise Companions, and Andreessen Horowitz.
Nonetheless, neither the Foundation staff nor the undertaking’s backers had performed their homework on U.S. securities laws. It quickly turned clear that the bonds and shares used to anchor Foundation to its greenback peg would represent unregistered securities, that means they might be topic to switch restrictions. As U.S. securities laws are notoriously troublesome to navigate, Foundation realized that making a “higher financial system” wasn’t going to be so simple as it had initially anticipated.
In December 2018, eight months after its $133 million elevate, Al-Naji posted an announcement on the Basis website revealing that it will be shuttering and returning its remaining capital to its backers. “Sadly, having to use U.S. securities laws to the system had a critical unfavourable influence on our capacity to launch Foundation,” the put up learn, including that complying with securities legal guidelines would influence the undertaking’s censorship resistance and scale back liquidity for its on-chain auctions.
Regardless of getting burned by Foundation, Andreessen Horowitz determined to take one other wager on Al Naji when he launched his subsequent blockchain startup: BitClout.
Marketed as the primary blockchain-based social media platform, BitClout lets customers put up updates and pictures, award cash to different customers’ posts, and purchase and promote what it calls “creator cash”—personalised tokens whose worth is determined by individuals’s reputations. BitClout runs by itself Proof-of-Work blockchain known as DeSo, quick for “Decentralized Social.”
Not like Andreessen Horowitz’s earlier flunked investments, the agency contributed by shopping for tokens in DeSo’s preliminary coin providing (ICO). In response to Crunchbase data, BitClout raised $200 million from 14 traders via its ICO, placing the typical contribution from every at round $14.2 million. Whereas particulars on what number of tokens traders obtained and the vesting interval are unknown, DESO is at present 97% down from its June 2021 all-time excessive of $198.68, per CoinGecko.
Curiosity in BitClout hasn’t been helped by the unfavourable notion the platform has earned itself since its launch. Initially, to purchase creator cash on BitClout, customers wanted to ship Bitcoin to the DeSo blockchain, which was then transformed into BTCLT at a one-to-one ratio. Nonetheless, as soon as on DeSo, there was no technique to convert BTCLT again to actual Bitcoin, successfully trapping customers’ funds. The withdrawal downside has since been partially resolved after DeSo made its code open-source. Nonetheless, many early customers misplaced appreciable quantities of cash as a result of distinction in demand between Bitcoin and BTCLT.
Though BitClout and the DeSo blockchain are nonetheless energetic, their futures don’t look shiny. The variety of wallets and creators interacting with the BitClout platform appears prefer it’s plateaued, and buying and selling volumes for BitClout’s creator cash are at an all-time low. Many have complained that BitClout monetizes Twitter profiles with out their homeowners’ permission. Stephen Palley, a companion at regulation agency Anderson Kill., has additionally argued that the DeSo ICO ought to have been classed as an unlawful securities providing.
In mild of one more of Nader Al-Naji’s crypto tasks failing to bear in mind U.S. securities legal guidelines, maybe Andreessen Horowitz ought to take heed of a sure previous adage when contemplating its future investments. “Idiot me as soon as, disgrace on you; idiot me twice, disgrace on me.”
Disclosure: On the time of scripting this characteristic, the writer owned ETH, BTC, and several other different cryptocurrencies.